La recherche a retourné 613 résultats
Aller sur la recherche avancée
- mar. oct. 07, 2025 1:15 am
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : (a<b)+c
- Réponses : 5
- Vues : 1516
Re: (a<b)+c
If symbolically (a<b)+c is interpreted as an inequality, adding +c to it, (b+c)>(a+c), arithmetically it has to be the same to be consistent.
- mar. sept. 30, 2025 6:36 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : (a<b)+c
- Réponses : 5
- Vues : 1516
Re: (a<b)+c
Why does the computational engine apply the rule of evaluating the left side first when it is an arithmetic operation? This is a standard in other CASs.
- mar. sept. 30, 2025 6:33 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : angle of a vector
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 1166
Re: angle of a vector
Hello
Please expand the functionality to accept a vector.
Please expand the functionality to accept a vector.
- sam. sept. 27, 2025 4:14 am
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : angle of a vector
- Réponses : 4
- Vues : 1166
angle of a vector
Hi, the command ARG() says Angle of a vector The arg command finds the angle of a complex number (the argument) or the angle of a vector defined by two points. arg takes v, a number or a vector defined by two points. arg(v) returns the argument of v if v is a complex number or the angle between the ...
- sam. sept. 20, 2025 5:00 am
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : (a<b)+c
- Réponses : 5
- Vues : 1516
(a<b)+c
Hello, why doesn't the distributive law apply in the arithmetic case?
(a<b)+c [enter] (b+c)>(c+a)
(9>8)-1 [enter] true-1, (1) -1 = 0
(9>8)-1 [enter] 9-1 < 8-1 , 8<7, true
(a<b)+c [enter] (b+c)>(c+a)
(9>8)-1 [enter] true-1, (1) -1 = 0
(9>8)-1 [enter] 9-1 < 8-1 , 8<7, true
- dim. août 17, 2025 2:25 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : distributive law in a sum and simplify cmd
- Réponses : 0
- Vues : 2737
distributive law in a sum and simplify cmd
Hello, I am unable to apply the distributive law in the following expression autosimplify(0) simplify(–1*(2+x+3)) => x*–1+5*–1 // It's fine, although it would look better if the numerical coefficients were placed on the left. -1*x*+5*–1 autosimplify(2) simplify(–1*(2+x+3)) => x*–1+5*–1 // would be e...
- dim. août 17, 2025 2:09 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : ToolBox Simplify: EXPAND cmd
- Réponses : 0
- Vues : 1806
ToolBox Simplify: EXPAND cmd
Hello,
In the Simplify ToolBox Menu, you need to add the EXPAND command, which is used a lot.
In the Simplify ToolBox Menu, you need to add the EXPAND command, which is used a lot.
- dim. août 03, 2025 2:04 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : CAS Setup
- Réponses : 0
- Vues : 2102
CAS Setup
Hello
I notice that students get confused in the CAS configuration, I think it would be good to add the operation limits in some fields, for example, list the possible options
Auto simplify: 0 None, 1: Minimum 2: Maximum, 3: ...
and similar in other fields
I notice that students get confused in the CAS configuration, I think it would be good to add the operation limits in some fields, for example, list the possible options
Auto simplify: 0 None, 1: Minimum 2: Maximum, 3: ...
and similar in other fields
- mar. juil. 08, 2025 5:57 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : Distribute power into quantity
- Réponses : 5
- Vues : 3191
Re: Distribute power into quantity
Idea
Add a new Scripts item to the menu bar, organizing them by category, so you can quickly paste a combination of important commands.
Scripts
EXPAND/
ExpandPow: exp2pow(texpand(lnexpand(pow2exp( | ))));
Add a new Scripts item to the menu bar, organizing them by category, so you can quickly paste a combination of important commands.
Scripts
EXPAND/
ExpandPow: exp2pow(texpand(lnexpand(pow2exp( | ))));
- jeu. juil. 03, 2025 1:32 am
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : Distribute power into quantity
- Réponses : 5
- Vues : 3191
Re: Distribute power into quantity
Hello, this cmds script is very useful in step by step algebraic development of expressions, but difficult to remember, please add a new command or an additional parameter in an existing function
- mar. avr. 22, 2025 2:40 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : distributive law
- Réponses : 1
- Vues : 3741
distributive law
Hello
why does the distributive law not hold for complex numbers?
simplify((3+4*i)*x+(4-3*i)*y) [enter] (3+4*i)*x+(4-3*i)*y
but
simplify((3+4*j)*x+(4-3*j)*y) [enter] 4*j*x - 3*j*y + 3*x+4*y
why does the distributive law not hold for complex numbers?
simplify((3+4*i)*x+(4-3*i)*y) [enter] (3+4*i)*x+(4-3*i)*y
but
simplify((3+4*j)*x+(4-3*j)*y) [enter] 4*j*x - 3*j*y + 3*x+4*y
- jeu. avr. 03, 2025 2:01 am
- Forum : Annonces
- Sujet : Xcas smartphones
- Réponses : 3
- Vues : 18190
Re: Xcas smartphones
Some menu functions that are very useful
Currently, only SELECT is available.
Menu
Select all
Edit selection
simplify
normal
factor
approx
exact
eval
Back
Forward
Currently, only SELECT is available.
Menu
Select all
Edit selection
simplify
normal
factor
approx
exact
eval
Back
Forward
- lun. mars 24, 2025 4:19 pm
- Forum : Annonces
- Sujet : Xcas smartphones
- Réponses : 3
- Vues : 18190
Re: Xcas smartphones
I like this online version because it looks like the PC version. Suggestion, the [sel] button should perform the same [Menu] functions as the PC version. I have tested on tablets and the buttons are manageable, but on a mobile it is very difficult, I think for mobiles a version with bigger buttons i...
- mer. déc. 11, 2024 5:01 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : cartesian_product(set[...],set[...])
- Réponses : 2
- Vues : 7621
Re: cartesian_product(set[...],set[...])
Hello but some CAS (MAXIMA) include it within the list of set instructions, it is important to have an alias to '*' as an explicit name, I think it costs nothing to extend the functionality of this command, as well as including the complement of a set command, and creating a submenu of set commands ...
- jeu. déc. 05, 2024 2:44 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : cartesian_product(set[...],set[...])
- Réponses : 2
- Vues : 7621
cartesian_product(set[...],set[...])
Hello xCas has set operation commands, for a future version please add a submenu 'SET' in the PC version, however the following command is very important in set theory cartesian_product( set[1], set[a,b] ) [enter] => A X B= {(1,a),(1,b)} this is to expand the functionality of cartesian_product if th...