Yep, now it's working again - many thanks!
Regards,
Franz
La recherche a retourné 35 résultats
Aller sur la recherche avancée
- jeu. janv. 14, 2021 6:04 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : problem with new xcaswininst
- Réponses : 8
- Vues : 3220
- jeu. janv. 14, 2021 3:11 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : problem with new xcaswininst
- Réponses : 8
- Vues : 3220
Re: problem with new xcaswininst
Good news? Not really ... I've now tested the new version of today, and it's only a bit faster - it still needs ~2 min compared to 1 sec in the 64bit version (or the old 32bit version). IMO there must be any other serious problem, because parsing a file can't take more than 100-times longer. Edit: I...
- mer. janv. 13, 2021 7:11 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : problem with new xcaswininst
- Réponses : 8
- Vues : 3220
Re: problem with new xcaswininst
The parser is way slower than with cygwin, I have no idea why : it's exactly the same bison/flex output than on Unix or with cygwin. Ive already seen such compiler differences in some other programs: e.g. the program DosBox-X contains several different versions, and the VS build is about 2.5 tmes s...
- dim. janv. 10, 2021 6:36 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : problem with new xcaswininst
- Réponses : 8
- Vues : 3220
problem with new xcaswininst
Hi, I'm wondering what happened to the new Xcas version (xcaswininst.exe)? This new version is SO SLOW that it's in fact unusable! It happens with lots of files loaded via 'Help > Examples' - e.g. demo\calcform.xws: After loading this file in the previous versions (installed with xcasinst.exe or xca...
- jeu. juin 23, 2016 1:06 pm
- Forum : Annonces
- Sujet : 1.2.2 stable
- Réponses : 46
- Vues : 47106
Re: 1.2.2 stable
Yes, now it's the current version - thanks!parisse a écrit :Should be fixed (it was because my hard disk was full).
- mer. juin 22, 2016 3:50 pm
- Forum : Annonces
- Sujet : 1.2.2 stable
- Réponses : 46
- Vues : 47106
Re: 1.2.2 stable
1.2.2-63: binaires disponibles aussi en windows 32, mac os x.6 et linux 32 bits archaique. Well, the file 'xcasunst.exe' has todays date, but it's exactly the same version as more than one month ago (from 12th May). :( (I've checked it with a byte compare) And for 'xcasinst.exe' it's the same, it's...
- ven. oct. 30, 2015 2:55 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : No more Xcas updates?
- Réponses : 1
- Vues : 9514
No more Xcas updates?
Hi,
is the Windows version of Xcas not updated anymore?
The last release has been more than 1 month ago ...
Franz
is the Windows version of Xcas not updated anymore?
The last release has been more than 1 month ago ...
Franz
- jeu. mai 07, 2015 8:33 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : serious problem in Xcas
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 9030
Re: serious problem in Xcas
But x may be assigned to say 3, a or a+1. If it's 3 or a+1, then it's clear it should not be evaluated. But how do you make the difference between a as integration variable or as a polynomial of degree 1 depending on a parameter ? You can't. Well, 2 remarks: 1) exactly the same reason would then al...
- jeu. mai 07, 2015 7:12 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : serious problem in Xcas
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 9030
Re: serious problem in Xcas
Well, I don't think it's a good idea to change that now, but I can add the following syntax int(expr,unquote(var)) I don't know what you mean with this 'unquote'. Well, I don't think changing this strange behaviour of 'integrate' (i.e. let it evaluate also its 2nd argument) would have any side-effe...
- jeu. mai 07, 2015 3:10 pm
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : serious problem in Xcas
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 9030
Re: serious problem in Xcas
This has indeed a side effect, you must either always use the same symbolic variable or subst the actual integration variable by a local integration variable Oops, that's indeed a bit strange (and uncomfortable), I don't know any other CAS where this has to be done in such a complicated way - quite...
- jeu. mai 07, 2015 9:39 am
- Forum : Xcas - English
- Sujet : serious problem in Xcas
- Réponses : 7
- Vues : 9030
serious problem in Xcas
Hi, while defining some own functions in Xcas (Windows version) I've found a serious problem - let me give 2 examples: diftest(f,x):={ return(diff(f,x)); } This function is ok, it returns the expected results: diftest(x^2,x) --> 2*x diftest(a^2,a) --> 2*a And now the same with 'integrate': inttest(f...
- mer. févr. 25, 2015 4:38 pm
- Forum : Xcas
- Sujet : Problem with the WIndows version?
- Réponses : 10
- Vues : 18616
Re: Problem with the WIndows version?
Yes, it's up-to-date now, thanks!parisse a écrit :No, thanks for checking, should be fixed now.
Franz
- mer. févr. 25, 2015 12:31 pm
- Forum : Xcas
- Sujet : Problem with the WIndows version?
- Réponses : 10
- Vues : 18616
Re: Problem with the WIndows version?
Just a question:
is it ok that xcas.exe is still dated 15.2.2015, when the other files (giac.exe/dll) are updated with todays date 25.2.2015?
Franz
is it ok that xcas.exe is still dated 15.2.2015, when the other files (giac.exe/dll) are updated with todays date 25.2.2015?
Franz
- mar. janv. 13, 2015 10:06 am
- Forum : Xcas
- Sujet : Problem with the WIndows version?
- Réponses : 10
- Vues : 18616
Re: Problem with the WIndows version?
Same problem now reappearing again:
yesterday and today new (?) xcasinst updates, but just exactly the versions from 9.Jan.
There seems to be something seriously broken with your build process.
Edit: Fixed, now it's a new version, thanks!
Franz
yesterday and today new (?) xcasinst updates, but just exactly the versions from 9.Jan.
There seems to be something seriously broken with your build process.
Edit: Fixed, now it's a new version, thanks!
Franz
- jeu. déc. 18, 2014 10:25 am
- Forum : Xcas
- Sujet : Problem with the WIndows version?
- Réponses : 10
- Vues : 18616
Re: Problem with the WIndows version?
Yes, at least it seems so.parisse a écrit :Thanks for reporting, should be fixed now!
Xcas itself is still reporting 1.1.3-12, but version() says giac 1.1.3-14, so I guess it's ok.
Thanks,
Franz