Hello
Hello, the boolen evaluation command when it cannot return a logical value must return the same input expression.
autosimplify(0); [enter]
evalb( (6+8*i)=(3+4*i) ) [enter] true
evalb( (6+8*i)≠(3+4*i) ) [enter] true
evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) [enter] evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) // why is the order evalb() being placed again?
evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) [enter] (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) : )
autosimplify(2); [enter]
evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) [enter] evalb((3+4*i)>0)
evalb command
Modérateur : xcasadmin
-
- Messages : 603
- Inscription : sam. févr. 04, 2017 11:34 pm
- Localisation : Colombia
- Contact :
Re: evalb command
I don't understand what you want, is it the suppression of evalb?
-
- Messages : 603
- Inscription : sam. févr. 04, 2017 11:34 pm
- Localisation : Colombia
- Contact :
Re: evalb command
Yes, I think you should remove the command in the output and leave just the argument
evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) [enter] (6+8*i)>(3+4*i)
message "no order in complex numbers"
evalb( (6+8*i)>(3+4*i) ) [enter] (6+8*i)>(3+4*i)
message "no order in complex numbers"